A Feminist's Take On: "Maleficent".

Disney has done it again; managing to re-write a classic fairytale with a modern day twist. Except this time, they change a fundamental part of their animation history. In their latest project, the juggernaut tackles one of the most classic stories from their vault; Sleeping Beauty. But be warned, Disney movie classicists, this is not your grandmother's fairytale. In fact, this is not your grandmother's villain! Maleficent is a wicked woman for the ages; a true, 21st century renaissance woman…with wings to boot! Be Warned, SPOILERS from here. 

From the very first moment she appears, as a young woodland creature we realize one fundamental fact; this is a woman as sharp as her cheekbones. Fine, they may have started her off as a 10 year old cutie with perfect hair; but she isn't to be played for a fool either. She calls out a young Stefan (yes, that Stefan) and reminds him of his place in the strange and darkly beautiful Moors. This is not a place for you, she reminds him, and warns him never to return. Sadly, as we watch the story play out, one realizes that Stefan is not the stuff of kiddy movies. He toys with her heart and her trust. Leading her on for years before finally committing the ultimate act of injustice against the title character. It would have to take a truly wicked act to cause Maleficent to take out her rage on an innocent child. And indeed, the act is both violent and goose bump worthy. With a gut-wrenching cry into the dark, the movie enters it's second act… and the other-worldly fairy becomes the Mistress of Darkness.

I could go on here to say how a very real love story develops as Maleficent watches the young princess grow from afar. How she grows a heart and soul once again… and the re-imagined meaning behind "true love's first kiss" in this version of fairy tale events. However, I'd much rather focus on the merits of Angelina Jolie's performance. Her portrayal is both deliciously wicked and generally aloof. There are  very little scenes of dark scheming and staff-pumping. In fact, other than that one, titular moment in the great hall where she imbues her "gift" upon a young Aurora (a beautiful nod to Sleeping Beauty, by the way) she is basically detached from the events of the original movie that inspired it. She much prefers to remain perched in a tree, her humanoid henchman at her side. Eating fruit and pursing her lips. "I don't like children" she chides like a true diva. She is above it all. Her green eyes aloof but also filled with vulnerability. She battles herself throughout; unsure of her motives but still reeling from her heart breaking loss early on.

"Before the sun sets on her sixteenth birthday, she will fall into a sleep-like death!"

This isn't about a woman scorned by a man. No, instead this is about being betrayed and then injured from within. She is no longer the woman she was before; she is unsure if love exists and therefore if she is good or bad by default. This is her movie, and she rules over it with an iron if not slightly disconnected fist. She doesn't need to rant and rave. Or deliver heavy handed monologues. Her eyes tell the story. The subtlety behind Jolie's performance gives it more merit. It helps an ancient story feel modern and real. Maleficent isn't the manifestation of pure evil. She is only human. Or, as human as a fairy can be, I suppose. She is messy and cruel at times, but also capable of realizing the reality behind her decisions. Whether she realizes the error of her ways or not, I'll leave for you to see for yourself as you enjoy the movie on the big screen.

At the end of the day, Jolie looked like she was having a blast. And so did we in the process. As I sat there enjoying the ride; watching her soar through the clouds with complete freedom I found myself wishing that I had wings too. That I could fly away with her and inhabit the Moors. I was transported to a time where magic was real, possibilities were endless; and the lines between fantasy and reality were blurred. Even, if only for an hour and a half.

A Love Letter to Mr. Johnny Depp

I know what this looks like; an impassioned, oblivious note of gush-worthy proportions. With a side of stalker. But I can assure you, my dear Muses, that my intentions are pure. No, really, they are. He is an actor who needs no introduction, his body of work speaks for itself and, most likely, more eloquently than I can. But yet, here I am, giving it a go regardless. Depp is a Muse simply because he is… he refuses to fit into any mold what so ever. He exists in an entirely different plane of creativity. A true patron of the arts, if you will, he doesn't seem to realize any cookie cutter role for himself; he is not merely the broody bad boy, the villain or the comedic actor. He embodies all three of these and has even created some molds all his own!

Consider Edward Scissorhands, for instance. How do you begin to characterize that creation? Both comedic, tragic and real all the same time. Yes, I said real. There is nothing more honest and vulnerable than the silent-movie qualities of dear old Edward. I could go into great detail about how technically awesome his portrayal was. But, I'll get a tad more personal than that. That movie has always touched me on a personal level. Who hasn't felt lost and alone, rudderless in this big and wide world? Or, at the very least, like an outsider? Edward is all of these things and yet, he refuses to change. Why should he, I asked myself as I was growing up with this movie on constant repeat. He is perfect and beautiful and pure… the world should be more like him. He touches the lives of a few and then disappears; going back to his isolated castle where he realizes that, being alone is it's own freedom after all.

That is only one example, and there is a long line of other creations from his internal factory, waiting in the wings. Literally too many to list here lest this turns into a 100 page thesis on his overall breed of creativity. He is a true chameleon, doing whatever it takes to dive into his roles. But, I am no critic. I am just a humble and
 loving fan. I rarely watch interviews because there is a certain repetitive nature to the questions being asked. That and, let's face the one reality here: we will never know him. I can only know him for that briefest of moments when he is projected in character form; like a living canvas on the screen for about two hours. But, in a way that is his gift to us. A small piece of himself, frozen in time forever so we can enjoy it over and over again. The Mad Hatter, Captain Jack Sparrow, Barnabas Collins, Ed Wood and countless others. They are ours to enjoy at our leisure.

So, as Mr. Depp stands on the eve of another movie release, I find myself holding my breath. As always, the trailer looks completely amazing. Trailers usually do. Transcendence, they say, is a "departure" for Depp because it is a marketable movie. Expectations seem high, but regardless if whether it's a hit or not, Depp probably isn't terribly worried. Despite all the commentary and judgement… all the haters who wait poised for failure, he has always, and ever been himself. He makes no apologies, and furthermore seems to genuinely not care. Well, I'm sure he cares… and if you happen to stumble upon this letter, Mr. Depp I want you to know, that I know, that you know…. wait what?

Oh my, it seems I've confused myself... oh well. He gets the picture. And if he doesn't, he can feel free
to drop me an email and I'll be more than happy to clear it up for him. Ecstatic, in fact. My simple point is: there is not enough said about how inspirational his journey is. He has been, and always  will be, himself. If you don't like it, then there are a multitude of other actors out there to gush over. He is respectful in his indifference. In many ways, he jumped off the conveyor belt some ways back, and decided to trail his own path through the bumpy roads ahead. Sink or swim, it's been his journey. In a lot of ways, he's proved that you can achieve success, and even fame for that matter,  while still  maintaining who he is. Being different is not a liability, he insists, aren't we all different and weird in our own ways, anyway? Shouldn't we just embrace that about ourselves?

I endeavor always to try. And for that, I'd like to thank him: thank you, sir, for making it just a flea's breath easier for the rest of us. Oh, and good luck on that little movie, Transcendence, coming out April, 18th.

A Feminist's take On: "Divergent"-- From Book to Movie.

I know what you're thinking; the book is entirely different from the movie. I mean, basically world's apart by adaptation standards. Where does one begin? How about starting here: I actually don't mind the sudden string of book-to-movie adaptations that are taking over the big screen lately. Once a book is written, it's out there. Out there for us to enjoy and live however we choose to; hence the whole theory of having a movie adaptation to begin with! It allows a whole new group of people to experience the story; to meet the characters and join the fandom. There really is enough room for everyone, I promise.

So, let me begin by saying, I didn't totally hate Divergent the movie. I didn't love it either. I could sit here and knit pick what I disliked and, honestly, when I set out to write this post I almost did! Yeah, no one wants to read that! No, instead I'm just going to condense my opinion to 2 issues that I found most frustrating. Because, overall, there were a lot of truly glowing moments. Like when Tris took that literal leap of faith into Dauntless. I held my breath , and then laughed with her when she landed successfully. What a rush! And then that first meeting with Four… sigh. Yes, I'm a huge Tobias Eaton groupie. Don't judge me. At least I don't stalk any real people. SPOILERS!

Point One: They tried to copy The Hunger Games. I'm the first one to point out that, yes, Divergent shares many things in common with this series. Dystopian America, check. Corrupt government, check. Control freak president figure with overall distain for human life, check. Yummy abs, check. But that's all on the surface. Whereas the Hunger Games uses the actual games as a basis for all the unrest, and eventual revolution, Divergent does not. The rigourous training is necessary; it allows the initiates to build up their bodies and minds. To face their perceived fears and to become stronger, inside and out. Tris grows through this experience and very literally becomes a "warrior woman". There is also no love triangle, no side to take on which man is most "deserving" of Tris' heart in the end. In fact, there is a very realistic, messy, emotional and volatile relationship at the heart of this story. They barely gave that relationship a chance to flourish, basically throwing it together during one "show me your tats" moment. What happened to the slow boil?  I'm certainly not saying the entire movie was a loss; I just wish that they had embraced what makes Divergent unique. However,I do have to admit it was amazing to see women in a position of power. There was no separation of gender training within Dauntless faction, each initiate had to train in the same facility while learning the same techniques. It was refreshing, and one of the things that makes this story so strong right from the start.

Point Two: The ending was painful.  I mean, why did they have to rework the ending to begin with? All of you who read the book will, hopefully, agree. They ruined the climatic ending sequence  involving Jeanine for Insurgent!  And, officially, reduced Tobias to a pretty boy. He had a bigger role in that final sequence (rather than flinging his girlfriend around) and it was meant to show his duality. He's not just a good trainer/fighter. He's also a smart guy, who works in INTELLIGENCE!! I think he even says as much, for a split second, at the beginning of the movie. Why didn't he shut down the computers HIMSELF, like he was supposed to?? Why did they have to MIND CONTROL Jeanine? Like she would have been so foolish as to have been standing right there. In Dauntless headquarters. Basically ground zero, the whole time. With dozens of witnesses to her depravity, controlling the simulation herself. I thought she was supposed to be from Erudite, the logical-thinking faction. And, how will this play out for Insurgent,  where Tobias and Tris are blamed for "crimes against humanity", because they are believed to have caused the entire attack on Abnegation. I mean, the writers did realize there was another book, correct? This does have to make sense even in a Sci-Fi universe!

Ok, ok I need to calm down. Deep, cleansing breaths.

Ok. I'm solid again. Sorry, guys, I almost lost my cool there. Anyways, I didn't mean to slam the movie.  Fine, maybe only a little bit. The casting, though, was like a bright light at the end of a dimly lit tunnel. Take Shailene Woodley for example. Although she got started on some ABC Family show, her break out moment finally came in The Descendants, playing George Clooney's troubled daughter, no less. She got the chance to prove that she isn't just another pretty face, out to play the same teen-angsty role over and over again. A fact she got to showcase here  in Divergent. She made Tris real for us. Showing all the facets of her personality; quiet and somewhat shy but  still smart and observant. She's a fighter and you realize, as you do when reading the book, that Tris was born a fighter all along.

And, of course, Theo James. Not only is he a brooding, handsome guy with big pouty lips. But he managed to break away from that stereotype, just enough to show that there is more to Four. His dry sarcasm was just enough to make us chuckle, and let's not forget that final scene. Yes, it made steam come out of my ears just a little bit. But, when Tris turns the gun towards herself, I actually held my breath. You see Four battling with himself, his eyes confused and hard and…vulnerable. That is the essence of Four, to me anyway. He breaks the stereotypes of what a man should be, as much as Tris does for women. A man can wield a gun and yet still be vulnerable and a little lost as well. He proves that walls can be brought down, that a man can be both soft and hard at the same time… that all Tobias really wanted was to be loved in the end.

Ok, now that I've said my piece, what part of the movie did you love, or even hate for that matter? Are you looking forward to Insurgent? Any thoughts on Allegiant?

On another note, I've become recently obsessed with Ellie Goulding's song, Beating Heart. Check it out here! And anyone looking for another interesting read in this same genre, you should really give the Delirium series a look. It's available in Hardcover and for your Kindle.

The Princess Project: Final Results.

   First, let me begin by thanking all of the Muses. We have duplicated in numbers in the month since this project started, thereby beginning my plot to take over the world. Or, G+ at least! All joking aside, your support and insight has been huge! So huge, in fact, that it was quite the task picking out quotes for the final collage! Check my Bulletin Board to take a closer look at a few of them.

Now that I got that off my chest, here is the final product of this month-long search for The Fairest among the bunch. For many of us, these images are the one's we've grown up with--that we've seen scattered all over the internet and within the Disney Store itself. My whole point, in conducting this little "project", was to put it to you. Who did you relate with more, I asked? Who was "The Fairest" in your eyes… and tell me, in your own words, why that is. So, here is our own little poster. I believe this provides a more accurate portrayal of why we love these ladies so much; what they stand for and mean to us. Our very first heroines and role models before there was a Katniss Everdeen or a Tris Prior.

I have often heard different sides of the argument of what these princesses stand for. Are these women setting unrealistic standards? Do they challenge gender norms, or quite the contrary, do they simply enforce feminine stereotypes that are ingrained in young girls as they grow up? I put my personal opinions asides and put it to you; Disney fans and Muses alike. The answer was a stark "NO!" Each of you found at least one to relate with. In the case of week two, a tie was formed. A decision couldn't be made between Belle and Jasmine; I tried to repost the collage again for your consideration but the answer was the same… a few of you even insisting I just use both. And so I did! Who am I to question my Muses? Also, Snow White not with standing, all of you had strong opinions regarding each lady. They are dreamers, rebels and fighters; all the while maintaining a certain level of feminine poise that you all could connect with or maybe even idealized in the end.

They are as varied and colorful as we are, showing us the true value of change, love and a strong sense of self. Never lose yourselves, they insist, never settle for less than absolute happiness. They highlight the power of love in the face of everything; even pure evil.. and how that, within itself, can be a purer weapon than a sword. Not to discount the power of a bow and arrow of course (I am a Hunger Games fangirl, after all) but there are various ways to endure through life's greatest challenges. It is just as difficult to fire off an arrow as it is to forgive an evil stepmother, for instance.

Regardless of the fact that they are fictional, they taught us the most important lesson of all: the fun of losing yourself in a fairytale. Whether it's in a book or a movie, we all want to believe in something. Why not in true love or magic? Besides, who knows, maybe we might find our own Happily Ever After in the end.

The Fairest of Them All

Do you remember this apple? You might recognize it from a previous post: The Golden Apple Awards. In the late 1940s and even the early 2000s, a similar award was handed out to honor women in film, with Sour Apples being given by those who were, say, more difficult to work with. The ideology of the Golden Apple goes back even further: to a Greek myth in which the Goddess of discord, Eris, is not invited to a wedding by held by Zeus. In retaliation, she shows up uninvited to the festivities and tosses a Golden Apple with the inscription To The Fairest scrawled across it. What inside afterwards, ladies and gentlemen, literally caused the siege of Troy. But, I digress

    Not wanting to create any discord between my Muses, I opted to hold a contest of our own here. There has been much debate over the years, and even most recently, as to the anti-feminist nature of the Disney Princesses. So, I put it to you. Who is The Fairest?

    There are so many to choose from, and with them spanning basically every generation how can you define the evolution of fictional, pop culture characters down to just one? So, my idea is, to post here on G+ an offering of 3 fair maidens a week for your consideration. Every Tuesday I'll refresh my offering, so look out for the next 3 (mostly done in order of their appearance to the Disney Dynasty). I'll be doing this till the end of the month, or basically when we've covered them all. 

 No, I'm not saying that one is better than the other… I think that the sheer fact that these princesses exist to empower and lead young girls into womanhood is totally amazing. For many of us, these were our first role models who taught us how to believe in magic, to fight for what we really want; and most importantly how to dream. This is partly for fun and also part social experiment. Many of these ladies have been around since before many of us were born, and let's face it,  perceptions of femininity have changed over the years. So, I'll be interested in seeing who we connect with the most. Have we found that certain princesses have changed for us as we've grown up? Do you think the themes of a certain, princess-themed Disney, movie might resonate more now than when you were a little girl? Or has it gone in reverse? And no, this is not a quiz so I don't expect any of you to want to answer these questions. This is basically just an example of what was going through my head when I came up with this idea in the first place.

And to what end, you ask? Well, each week the "winner" (their not really winners so much as the chosen ones) will wind up in my list, in no particular order of course. So, please comment and vote. I'm hoping to create a post around your own words. As I stated once before, it gets quite lonely in my little Corner here…and I do get tired of my own voice. 

So, thank you for stopping by and joining in my little "game". Please check back for further developments and I'll see you all again next week!

UPDATE: I just expanded my horizons…to Facebook! I've noticed, in my travels, that anyone outside of G+ can't comment on my little Princess Project here. So, let's see how this goes, but I'm going to give another Social Networking site a try. So, if you make it to my blogpost here, follow me on Facebook and spread the word! I would greatly appreciate it:  facebook.com/bontecorner

UPDATE for the UPDATE: Hey all, just checking in on week three. For everyone that noticed Week two's re-posting of the Princess Project Poster; yes there was a tie. I'm sure it comes as no surprise, however, that it was going to be a very close call. Many of you even asked me to just go with both fair and very strong ladies; so I took your advice! Thanks for all your help and support these past three Weeks. Please spread the word. I'm now on Facebook as you can see in my update above. Thanks for 1,000+ views on Bronte's Muse; and over 100 "+1s" on this blog post alone! Please follow my blog so you can get an update when I post the final results of all your hard work and support! We're getting down to the wire. Only one more week to go!  And who knows, Something Wicked could be waiting around the bend…  

A Love Letter to Mr. Rochester

How do you begin a love letter to a fictional character? It's funny; not funny as in LOL funny but simply interesting-funny to consider how real a character can become… how they almost take their first breaths when you open the pages of the book and then linger in the back of your mind for days or even years after you set that book aside. And so it is with Mr. Edward Fairfax Rochester.

For any self-respecting bookworm, it's almost a natural event. It happens every once in a while. You kind of hold your breath the first moment said character arrives on the page; even after a thousand times of reading Jane Eyre it is always the same. This time around, I even rushed to her first wanderings in the woods where she trips up his horse to hear his thundering, swearing voice. I suppose my somewhat wayward affections began because he is a completely singular character. He is neither handsome nor perfect nor even very young. He is no Mr. Darcy or even an Edward Cullen (i.e a sensitive man to the emotions of his lady love). In fact he is quite the opposite of almost any other male character in literature.

He is allowed to be ugly and cool; brooding at times. The kind of character whom you're not sure is being totally honest in his affections or merely sarcastic. He keeps Jane guessing from the very beginning…and I ask you ladies, what man hasn't?  Sometimes, your girl friends or family members pointed out all his flaws; yet  all you could see was the inner beauty of the man. And somehow you knew he felt the same way… thus it is with Mr. Rochester. He loves Jane in all her forms; she is neither too plain for him or too smart. Too independent or too needy. He simply loves her as she is, he never asks her to be more or less that what she is. I think that is what we all want in the end.

And so I find myself in this Conundrum. I have been for several months as I tried to figure out a way to write this letter in honor of him. I even started hunting down every film adaptation; trying to find the answer in each actors' interpretation of his harsh lines and imperfect personality. My favorite being the most recent version starring Michael Fassbender (and that sparked a whole other infatuation). I truly felt he is the most physically attractive of all the Rochester actors; allowing the inner ugliness of the character to shine through. At the same time I couldn't ignore the sexiness he brought to the role, that sense of mischievousness that sparkled in his eye.

There were moments that Jane's (Waskiowska) retorts to his probing questions nearly made him look like he was about to laugh, before he looked away into the flames of the fire. It's felt like I rediscovered the character; hence making this movie my favorite version of all the adaptations. It was beautiful and haunting; it high lightened the sacrifice one makes when they choose to love a person. But most of all, it was realistic. We can all agree love is messy and cruel and painful at times; it isn't a fairytale. And sometimes, as in Jane Eyre, the man that you fear might destroy is the very person that needs to be saved.

Sigh… I'm afraid i'm no closer to writing that pesky love letter. Maybe I should just read the book again..

The Golden Apple Awards: 2013 Season

       No, this is not another Oscar tribute. In fact, the Golden Apple pictured above holds a very special place in feminine history. You see, this glittery fruit got it's start in mythology, most notably in the tale of the Judgement of Paris. Eris, the goddess of discord, was denied an invitation to the wedding of Peleus and Thetis. To stir up a bit of drama, she scrawled across a golden apple the now infamous words: "To the Fairest". Three goddess claimed the apple: Hera, Athena and Aphrodite-- with each bearing a different claim towards what that phrase actually meant. With no resolution in sight, these three mavens turned to the judgement of a mortal named Paris... literally causing a war in their wake.

In cinematic history, the Golden Apple held a slightly less controversial role. From 1941 to about the mid-1980's, this small token was awarded in honor of those actors/actresses that were considered easy to work with. The Sour Apple happens to be it's counter-part, of course.

So, what's the point you ask--scratching your head against all this information? Well, the point is simple: to honor female-driven movies that may have been overlooked by the Academy in the wake of the current award season. There is no discord intended here, with each movie listed below bearing equal merit as the one below it.

Here they are, the very first Golden Apple Awards. Spoilers! You have been warned.

Frozen 

There are few studios, I think, that have such an impressive line up of strong female characters, not only in animation, but basically anywhere! But I digress (perhaps I should do a top 10 of female Disney characters in the future). 

No where is this example more present than in this completely female driven, animated movie. It's a movie about sisters, and for once the romance portion is put on the back burner in favor of showing a positive, if not, complicated relationship between two sisters. The story is uncluttered and easy to follow, the music is outstanding and the visuals are intricate enough to feel real. Not since Beauty and the Beast have I really felt that a movie deserved an Oscar more. (and no, not just for best animated feature) Or, at least a Best Actress in an Animated Movie for Idina Menzel. Mostly, I just loved the overall message, showcased in the flagship song Let it Go, the fact that you should just be who you are and embrace whatever perceived "flaws" you might have…because in reality, there is no sense of normal anyway! I just love the strong female leads, the fact that sisterly bonds can be totally unconditional and fulfilling in their own way. And the fact that there is no clear cut love interest for the title character. Elsa learns to love herself and her gifts; she becomes a great queen and a great big sister. She discovers that's all she really needs in the end. A great message for young girls (and the not so young girls for that matter). 

Gravity

The plot is simple: the ultimate isolation movie, a person lost in space. It's not a new plot by any stretch, being pretty overused in the last five years alone. This one stood out for one big reason;  Sandra Bullock, who made it real for all of us. I, at least, was there with her and found my breathing getting labored as she tumbled aimlessly out into the black abyss of space. 

The metaphors for this movie and the struggles of women in general are endless; just simply the idea of a woman being out in a forum that she is not familiar with, a world or career populated mostly by men only to be left deserted and alone out there with only your fears of failure to keep you company. Then, she eventually calms down and find her way out of the situation feeling both empowered and alive at the same time. Most of all, it transcended the whole, gimmicky 3D thing, to be a really good movie all on it's own. The kind that once your pulse slows down, you just want to go right back in there….just maybe not in 3D this time… that was just too real for me. 

Catching Fire

In a world dominated by adaptations like The Twilight Saga; that basically teaches young girls that it's ok to change your basic biology to fit into the general needs of your dead-eyed boyfriend (and birth his demon spawn), it was a breath of fresh air to enter the world of The Hunger Games. Now I know it's the fan girl in me talking here…in a big way, but I really do feel the story is quite strong. I know it's hard to talk about the movie without going into the book, but the movie itself deserves kudos. Yes some things were added that weren't in the book itself but, seriously, get over it. Jennifer Lawrence is amazing. Period. The cast roundup is a bulls eye in my opinion, with every actor and actress really getting the essence of their characters. 

But beyond all of that, I just think it's about damn time that a woman get credit for being a girl and still kicking some major ass. Katniss is just that; as stated in my pervious post but, hell, I'll just dive in again. She is a woman trapped between two sides of herself, trying to find her way in a  complicated world. Looking out for everyone because she can't just turn her back on her family, or Peeta or Haymitch without feeling that she's failed in some way. She has her own fears and insecurities; as well as a passion to survive and live…not exist but truly live her life. In all it's forms, Catching Fire truly expands on all this subject matter to bring you Katniss; to make us feel for her and root for her because you want her to find out what it is she wants. It's not about whether she chooses Peeta or not (ok fine, it is a little bit) but it's about her finding herself and fighting for her right to exist, for better or for worse. That, in my opinion anyway, is what makes the movies so great. And allowing the general public (not just the reading public) to experience that in the visual feast, which are the essence of the book trilogy. 

Now, these three are my choices. Are there any that I missed? Or anything you'd care to add? Please let me know!